If you have been diagnosed with Grade 2, 3, or 4 piles, and your GP has suggested surgery, you may be eligible for PPH, a NICE-recommended, minimally invasive procedure. PPH was first introduced to the UK in 1998 as a simple, safe, and effective alternative to traditional haemorrhoidectomy.
Like a haemorrhoidectomy, PPH is recommended for those with very serious cases of piles (those with Grades 2-4). When comparing PPH to conventional haemorrhoidectomy, the biggest difference may be the amount of pain involved in each procedure. While conventional haemorrhoidectomy is considered to be very painful, people who undergo PPH have reported less pain.
Comparing PPH and Conventional Haemhorroidectomy
| Patient Consideration |
PPH |
Conventional Haemorrhoidectomy |
| Post-operative Pain |
Less painful 1 |
More Painful |
| Recovery Time |
Less Recovery Time 2 |
More Recovery Time |
| Length of Procedure (Operating Time) |
Less Operating Time 3 |
More Operating Time |
| Length of Hospital Stay |
Shorter Stay 4 |
Longer |
| Complications from Surgery |
Same 5 |
Same |
| Patient Satisfaction |
More satisfaction 6 |
Less satisfaction |
Conclusion
People who choose to undergo PPH have less postoperative pain, more satisfaction, and shorter hospital stay than those who have the conventional haemorrhoidectomy.